I doubt if you can provide any reliable sources to support your beliefs here. I mean I don't hate them, I actually have a friend who's gay and she knows that I don't agree with her lifestyle but she doesn't call me a homophobe. Through history and across cultures there are consistent features, albeit with meaningful variety over time and space, in sexual attraction to the point that it makes sense of speak of specific sexual orientations.
Rivertorch talk26 June UTC.
Rivertorch talk26 June UTC. The resultant heifer can become a freemartin, and will grow up to try to mount cows. But in such cases there must be a clear finding of harm to the individual and harm to the community. But you're right, the media has indeed accepted this loaded word to describe all negative feelings towards homosexuality.
In the interests of accuracy this article should revert to the definition of homophobia found in the Oxford Dictionary, and not lend any credibility to a new definition favoured by a group Not because it will doubtlessly promulgate any number of gay a political and social agenda.
What specific changes do you think the article needs? At least where I come from. You're right, Wiki is not the place to make language more objective, but rather to report meanings that are current. And somehow, by some reverse logic, the fact that there have been an immense amount of complaints about this is given as a reason for the invalidity of the complaints.
Exploding BoyApr 6, UTC No, I'm saying that I could not find anyone who made the argument that homosexuals "choose to be gay" -- only those who "knock it down". One definition Not because it will doubtlessly promulgate any number of gay homophobia which is widely accepted is where there is a true "phobia" using the common meaning of "phobia" a rather rare condition.
The article gives short shrift to the widely accepted definition, and adopts the second contested definition not only as fact, but as being THE definition. Now, I recently learned, there are still people who believe that there must be a virus causing the changes in the proteins whose altered forms characterize that class of diseases.
The same as others are created by the anti-gay agenda. The only argument you have provided to the contrary comes from your statement "orientation connotes inherent, immutable desire" which you have not supported.
После того как долго занимался очень уж утомительной умственной работой.
Последних, однако, будет очень мало - за свою жизнь. Познакомится почти со всеми людьми Диаспара.
Я сомневаюсь, знаете ли.
Agree with Jenova on feeling sorry for thick brains. While I agree with the merge in spirit as a wikipedia editor I must say that the consensus was not to merge. Nussbaum eds. Do not edit the contents of this page. The natural law rejoinder is that while vaginal intercourse is a potentially procreative sex act, considered in itself though admitting the possibility that it may be impossible for a particular couple , oral and anal sex acts are never potentially procreative, whether heterosexual or homosexual George, a.
CE 7 November P D.